STATE BANK OF INDIA vs O.L.OF NEW GUJARAT SYNTHETICS LTD.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
K.A.PUJ, J
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
O.L.OF NEW GUJARAT SYNTHETICS LTD. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR RM DESAI
For the Respondents: OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, MS AMEE YAJNIK, MR DS VASAVADA, NANAVATI ASSOCIATES, MR NITIN K MEHTA

Table of Content
1. application for possession of land by state bank. (Para 1)
2. creation of mortgage on land by ngsl. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. inquiry regarding possession and valuation of land. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. arguments regarding the rights of the mortgagee. (Para 10 , 11)
5. respondents assert ownership against the applicant. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
6. court's view on the rights of the current possessors. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)

JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD COMPANY APPLICATION No. 280 of 2004 With COMPANY APPLICATION No. 312 of 2004 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= STATE BANK OF INDIA - Applicant(s) Versus O.L.OF NE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

GUJARAT HIGH COURTK.A.PUJ, JSTATE BANK OF INDIA – AppellantVersusO.L.OF NEW GUJARAT SYNTHETICS LTD. – Respondent

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
K.A.PUJ, J
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
O.L.OF NEW GUJARAT SYNTHETICS LTD. – Respondent