SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
A.M.KAPADIA, J
STERLING ENTERPRISE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SANJAY V. VADHERA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MS MEGHA JANI
For the Respondents: MR. M.A.PARIKH

Table of Content
1. question of plaintiffs' claim and prior agreements (Para 1 , 2)
2. jurisdictional challenges and procedural compliance (Para 3 , 4)
3. submissions highlighting procedural rights of parties (Para 5 , 6)
4. evaluation of evidence and arguments prior to ongoing proceedings (Para 8 , 10)
5. final directions regarding the continuation of proceedings (Para 14 , 15)

JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 378 of 2005 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================================= STERLING ENTERPRISE LTD. - Appellant(s) Versus SANJAY V. VADHERA - Defendant(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MS MEGHA JANI for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top