JUDGEMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 2014 of 2006 with SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.2015 of 2006 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI ========================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ? ========================================= CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD., - Applicant(s) Versus SHRI T. RUIVAH INSPECTOR HQRS.(PREVENTIVE UNIT - Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance : MR MIHIR THAKORE, SR. ADVOCATE for SINGHI & CO for petitioners MR HRIDAY BUCH for Respondent ========================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI Date : 14/09/2012 ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Since identical reliefs are prayed for in both these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the facts