SITARAM TULSIRAM SISODIA vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
C.K. BUCH, J
SITARAM TULSIRAM SISODIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR KISHOR D PANCHAL
For the Respondents: MS HANSA PUNANI, APP

Table of Content
1. summary of facts surrounding the case and the charges against the appellant. (Para 3 , 4)
2. evaluation of evidence and context surrounding the accusations against the appellant. (Para 5 , 6)
3. judicial agreement with trial findings and legal reasoning. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. finality of the appeal and the confirmation of the trial court's decision. (Para 10)

JUDGEMENT

1.Ld. Counsel Mr. K.D. Panchal appearing for the appellant-accused is absent when called out. On 7.2.2002, when this matter was listed for final hearing, ld. counsel for the appellant was found absent and, therefore, this Court passed the following order:-

"When this Appeal was called out and taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for appellant was absent. Even on second call, he is absent.

Learned APP Ms. Punani appearing for the respondent State has taken me through relevant part of the judgment. This appeal has been listed today on Board for final hearing as Counsel for appellant has mentioned specifically that same should be listed for final hearing and should be heard peremptorily as appellant has undergone substantive part of the sentence. On on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

GUJARAT HIGH COURTC.K. BUCH, JSITARAM TULSIRAM SISODIA – AppellantVersusSTATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
C.K. BUCH, J
SITARAM TULSIRAM SISODIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent