Back
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
K.A.PUJ, J
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
O.L. OF GUJARAT STEEL TUBES LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. company applications filed by sail (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. nature of the criminal complaints and winding up implications (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. jurisdictional powers under section 446 of the companies act (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. role and authority of the official liquidator (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. counterarguments regarding the application proceedings (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. legal process delays and their implications (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. rejoinders against the procedural conduct (Para 21 , 22) |
| 8. court's analysis on the need of transfer (Para 23 , 24) |
| 9. conclusion on the jurisdiction and transfer of complaints (Para 25 , 26) |
| 10. final directive and disposal of applications (Para 27 , 28) |
JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD COMPANY APPLICATION No. 428 of 2004 WITH COMPANY APPLICATION No. 429 of 2004 COMPANY APPLICATION No. 430 of 2004 COMPANY APPLICATION No. 431 of 2004 In COMPANY PETITION No. 7 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ===================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
