SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
D.K. TRIVEDI, J
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
DINESH JAGA RABADIYA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: U.R.Bhatt
For the Respondents: Mehul Shah

Table of Content
1. claimants are entitled to execute judgment for compensation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. government's argument on interest entitlement contested. (Para 3)
3. existing legal precedents affirm claimants' rights. (Para 4)

JUDGEMENT

1.The petitioner - State of Gujarat - original opponent has filed these Revision Applications challenging the orders passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Jamnagar below Application Exh.1 in respective Darkhast filed by the respondents-claimants, wherein the learned Joint District Judge, Jamnagar has issued Jangam Warrant for attachment of property under Order 21 Rule 30 of the C.P.C. in respect of the decretal amount under the Award, which was granted in favour of the claimants. It is not in dispute that the lands of the respondents- claimants were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act and the Land Acquisition Officer has fixed the compensation by declaring the Award. The References were filed before the District Court under Sec.18 of the Land Acquisition Act and the learned Extra Assistant Judge, Jamnagar in Land Reference Case No.361/87 and others by common order has allowed the References of the claimants partly by granting add

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top