SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
H.H.MEHTA, J
PRAJAPATI BABIBEN – Appellant
Versus
PRAJAPATI MANIBEN – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR PK JANI
For the Respondents: MR MEHUL SHARAD SHAH

Table of Content
1. court's discretion in injunction cases emphasizes the importance of evidential support. (Para 10)
2. entries in revenue records clarified regarding property rights disputes. (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 16)
3. court's final ruling on appeal and granting of interim relief. (Para 15 , 17)

Dungarbhai Dosabhai Prajapati.

b. Dungarbhai Dosabhai Prajapati was having three

properties described in sub-para-(a), (c) and (d)

of para-3 of the plaint. From the side of

respondent Nos.1 and 2, there is a dispute to the

effect that plaintiffs have not produced any

documentary evidence to show that one Khodabhai

Haribhai - cousin brother of plaintiffs and

Dungarbhai Dosabhai Prajapati were the co-owners

of the agricultural land bearing Block No.292.

This property is described in sub-para-(b) of

para-3 of the plaint.

c. Each of plaintiffs and husband of defendant No.1

has got 1/3rd share in the properties of

Dungarbhai Dosabhai Prajapati.

d. Dungarbhai Dosabhai Prajapati died on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top