SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
PALI RAMJIBHAI LAXMANBHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 9th June 1997 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad Rural in Sessions Case No.21/96.

2. The appellant was original accused No.1 who was charged with offence punishable under section 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. There were two more accused, who were also charged with similar offence. Accused No.2 expired during trial. Accused No.3 was acquitted of the charges. Appellant herein, original accused No.1 was, however, convicted under section 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code, but acquitted under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. He was awarded sentence of 7 years of rigourous imprisonment. He has, therefore, filed this appeal.

3. The prosecution case was that on 17th December 1994 at about 5 O' clock in the evening, the accused had kidnapped one Bhartiben from the lawful guardianship of her guardian. As per the prosecution, date of birth of Bhartiben was 19.7.78. She was thus aged 16 years and 5 months (approximately) on the date of the incident.

4. PW-1, Bhartiben was examined at Ex.7. She stated that she knew the accused and they were neighbours before the accused changed his resi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top