SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 2572

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
AMITBHAI HARIBHAI CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
['ANIL S DAVE', '', 'SHILPA R SHAH', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', 'VIRAL K SALOT']

CAV JUDGMENT

1.0. As common question of law and facts arise in this group of applications and as such to challenge the common FIR, all these applications are heard, decided and disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2.0. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 10890 of 2008 has been preferred by the petitioners herein-original accused nos. 1,3,4, 6 and 7 to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being I-CR- No. 351 of 2008 registered with Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code.

2.1. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 11134 of 2008 has been preferred by the petitioner herein-original accused no. 2 to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being I-CR-No. 351 of 2008 registered with Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code.

2.2. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 11241 of 2008 has been preferred by the petitioner herein-original accused no. 9 to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being I-CR-No. 351 of 2008 registered with Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top