GUJARAT HIGH COURT
AMITBHAI HARIBHAI CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
CAV JUDGMENT
1.0. As common question of law and facts arise in this group of applications and as such to challenge the common FIR, all these applications are heard, decided and disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2.0. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 10890 of 2008 has been preferred by the petitioners herein-original accused nos. 1,3,4, 6 and 7 to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being I-CR- No. 351 of 2008 registered with Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code.
2.1. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 11134 of 2008 has been preferred by the petitioner herein-original accused no. 2 to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being I-CR-No. 351 of 2008 registered with Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code.
2.2. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 11241 of 2008 has been preferred by the petitioner herein-original accused no. 9 to quash and set aside the impugned FIR being I-CR-No. 351 of 2008 registered with Sabarmati Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.