Back
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
MR. M.S. SHAH, MR. D.H. WAGHELA, MR. AKIL KURESHI, JJ
SUO MOTU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of maintenance dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. notice of conflicting judicial opinions. (Para 7) |
| 3. discussion on powers of magistrate. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. interpretation of section 125(3) crpc. (Para 10) |
| 5. empowerment of magistrate for maintenance orders. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. understanding the default and consequences. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. trends and interpretations across high courts. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. clarification of apex court's decision. (Para 21) |
| 9. final ruling on magistrate's sentencing powers. (Para 22) |
JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL REFERENCE No. 2 of 2008 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI ====================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ? 4 Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ? 5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil ju
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
