IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
AJAY GUJARATI S/O BEJI GUJARATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
[1.0] Registry to accept vakalatnama of learned advocate Mr. Tushar L. Chauhan, who has instructions to appear for respondent No.3 – victim.
Though matter is filed under the head of consent quashing, respondent No.2 – original complainant has expired pending the petition and therefore, petition is considered on its merits.
[2.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat and learned advocate Mr. Tushar L. Chauhan waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of respondent No.3.
[3.0] By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 5 28 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”), the petitioner has sought for quashing of the FIR being CR No.11192061210080 of 2021 registered with Viramgam Town Police Station, District Ahmedabad for the offences under Sections 363 , 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 and under Sections 4 , 5(l), 6 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act alongwith the proceedings of POCSO Case No.19/2021 pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, at Viramgam, District Ahmedabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.