Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. MENGDEY, J
MAHESHBHAI RAMANBHAI CHUNARA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of allegations concerning the theft. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. submissions by the applicant's counsel for bail. (Para 3) |
| 3. court observations on considerations for bail. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's ruling on granting bail and imposed conditions. (Para 7) |
| 5. final outcome of the application. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.
2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11192060250104 of 2025 registered with Viramgam Rural Police Station, District Ahmedabad (Rural).
3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the applicant along with the other co-accused had committed theft of 12 sheeps belonging to the first informant. Learned APP has, therefore, submitted that the offence is serious in nature and looking to the facts as well as the allegations levelled against the applicant, no
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
