Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. MENGDEY, J
MUKESHBHAI DINANATH GOSWAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the offence and role of the applicant. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. submissions regarding the release on bail. (Para 3) |
| 3. consideration of factors for bail and court observations. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. criteria for exercising discretion in granting bail. (Para 7) |
| 5. final order and conclusion regarding bail. (Para 8 , 10) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.
2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11216009230811 of 2023 registered with Mansa Police Station, District Gandhinagar.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that after registration of the present offence, the applicant had absconded for three years. The applicant is main perpatrator in the present offence as it was the present applicant who had projected the other persons as fake agriculturist and on that basis, the doc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
