Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. MENGDEY, J
AMBALAL SHANKARLAL SUTHAR & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application filed under relevant law. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. details of fraud and applicants' societal position. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. conditions for bail and court order issuance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
ORAL ORDER
1. The Applicants have filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 for enlarging the Applicants on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11210008250439 of 2025 registered with Sarthana Police Station, Surat.
2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent - State.
3. Learned Advocate for the Applicants has submitted that the Applicants have good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicants are ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
4. Per contra, learned APP has opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the present Applicant had obtained money worth Rs.13,66,00,000/- from the first i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
