Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
M. R. MENGDEY, J
KAMLESHPAL RAMPRAVESHPAL PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. description of application and initial court response. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments from both sides regarding bail application. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's considerations and factors influencing the bail decision. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. outcome of the bail application and granted conditions. (Para 8) |
| 5. final administrative directives from the court. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11211045250187 of 2025 registered with Sayla Police Station, Surendranagar.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
