Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO, J
UTSAV CORPORATION THROUGH POA MEHULBHAI ASHOKBHAI ASMANIYAWALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for leave to appeal regarding acquittal. (Para 1) |
| 2. advocate presentations highlighting merits. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's review of evidence suggests appeal merits. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 4. respondent's defense articulated but not persuasive. (Para 4) |
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application is filed by the applicant – original complainant seeking leave to file an appeal against the judgement and order passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat (hereinafter referred to as the “learned Trial Court”) in Criminal Case No. 88660 of 2023 dated 03.04.2025, whereby, the learned Trial Court was pleased to acquit the accused from the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to “the N.I.Act” for short).
2. Heard learned advocate Mr. Anand Tailor for the applicant and learned APP Ms. C.M.Shah for the respondent State.
3. Learned advocate Mr. Anand Tailor for the applicant submits that the applicant is the Power of Attorney Holder of the partnership firm “Utsav Corporation”and the respondent no.2 is the proprietor of ‘Ravi Stitchers” were having business transactions. The applicant had given some cloth for stitching unif
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
