Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J
RAJENDRA KUMAR JETHABHAI PATEL & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners sought to quash orders based on statutory violation. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents argued the land purchase violated established law. (Para 4) |
| 3. court found the certification refusal lacked jurisdictional validity. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. the application was allowed; previous orders were quashed. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard the learned counsels for the parties.
2. In the present Special Civil Application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 30.11.2015 passed by the Special Secretary, Revenue Department, confirming the order dated 31.07.2014 passed by the Collector, which upheld the order dated 28.03.2011 passed by the Deputy Collector, whereby the mutation entry in favour of the petitioners based on the registered sale deed is not certified.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners had purchased the land bearing Block No.322, situated at Village Pedhmala, Taluka Himmatnagar, District Sabarkantha. He submits that accordingly, the mutation entry No.1504 dated 08.10.2009 came to be entered in the revenue record. However, the said entry was not certified on the grounds that the l
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
