SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 10030

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
A B C THRO MAHENDRABHAI NATUBHAI PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 13314 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR PV PATADIYA
For the Respondents: MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP

The court determined that termination of a viable pregnancy beyond the statutory limit is impermissible, citing the rights of the unborn and the minor's well-being.

Headnote:This Court addresses the plea for medical termination of pregnancy filed by the father of a minor victim of sexual abuse, emphasizing the application of statutory provisions and the minor's mental health. The Court cites the statutory limits and medical assessments, concluding that termination cannot be permitted due to the fetus's viability and absence of substantial abnormalities. The relief requested is denied, yet provisions for the health and care of the minor and the newborn are mandated.

ORAL ORDER

[1.0] The father of the victim has approached this Court seeking following relief:-

“Your Lordships may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction to the respondent authority to terminate the pregnancy of the petitioner who is aged 17 years and 01 months and 27 days, at the earliest, as the same being in the best interest of the victim, considering her very young age, physical health and incident of rape causing grave injury to her mental health and further be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to hand over, in scientific manner, the tissues drawn from the fetus for DNA identification to the Police Inspector, Halol Rural, Panchmahal for onward transmission of the same to the concerned Forensic Science Laboratory, in the interest of justice; ”

[2.0] Since victim of sexual abuse is a minor, her identity has not been disclosed in this order and she has been referred to as the 'minor’ or the ‘victim' in the entire order. Registry is directed to anonymize the name of the minor / victim in the judgment and all orders that may be passed as well as in the records which are publicly available.

[3.0] The facts taken out from the petition, are as under:-

[3.1] The father of the victim, on 05.08.2025 has filed the FIR being CR No.11207079250585 of 2025 with Halol Rural Police Station, District Panchmahal for the offences punishable under Sections 6 4 (1), 64(2)(m), 65(1), 332(b), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 and sections 4, 5(l), 6 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act , 2012.

[4.0] On 29.09.2025, this court has passed following order:-

“Issue NOTICE returnable on 30.09.2025 Learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent – State.

Meanwhile, let the victim minor be examined by the empaneled Doctors at S.S.G. Hospital, Vadodara – respondent No.3 herein, consisting of Medical Superintendent, Senior Female Gynecologist and Psychologist. The victim should be admitted immediately and medical examination shall be carried out to let this Court know as to whether termination of pregnancy is medically feasible considering the fact that she is allegedly victim of rape and her guardian inclines to terminate her pregnancy. Doctors concerned shall follow settled guidelines to know her mental and psychological preparedness. Respondent No.3 is specifically directed to opine about the status of the fetus, as the pregnancy is at 26 weeks and 6 days (as on 15.09.2025). The authority shall also ascertain the calculative risk and complications to the mother (who is a minor herein), as well as the availability of tertiary care facilities to the mother and clarify the risk factors qua the mother in the event the proposed termination of pregnancy is allowed. The Medical Board is also directed to clearly opine as to whether or not the foetus is viable or alive, and whether the foetus has any abnormality or not. The investigating officer is directed to make all necessary arrangement and facilitate the medical examination of the victim and submit a report before the Court tomorrow.

Direct service TODAY is permitted.

[4.1] Pursuant to the aforesaid order, a committee comprising of Dr. Purvi Patel, Assistant Professor, Dept. of O & G; Dr. Anu Patel, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Psychiatry and Dr. Garima Gandhi, Assistant Professor, Dept. of O & G, Medical College & SSG Hospital, Baroda on 30.09.2025, opined as under:

“1. Laxmiben Mahendrabhai Parmar is having 30 weeks viable pregnancy on clinical examination. On ultrasound examination period of gestation is 29 weeks and 2 days. The stomach bubble, urinary bladder, four chambered heart, bilateral kidney appears unremarkable. No gross anomaly seen. No significant fetal anamoly noted (done on 30/09/225 by Dr. Chandni Wadhwani Assistant Professor Radiology)

2. On clinical examination, no significant systemic abnormality detected. Moreover at present she does not show signs of any associated pregnancy complications.

3. While doing Psychiatry int

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top