Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R. T. VACHHANI, J
SHAUNAK NARAYANRAV PAVAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application seeks to explain a substantial delay in filing. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations on applicant's delay and reasoning. (Para 3) |
| 3. court clarified the judicial discretion regarding condonation of delay. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. final ruling and dismissal of application. (Para 6) |
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of the present application, the applicant has sought condonation of delay of 407 days in preferring the captioned application challenging the judgment and order dated 15.05.2024 passed by the Family Court, Vadodara in Criminal Misc. Application No.1452 of 2019, whereby the applicant was directed to pay maintenance of Rs.7000/- per month to the opponent–wife from the date of the application, along with costs, under the provisions of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure .
2. Reverting to the facts of the present case and the grounds urged by the applicant, it transpires from paragraphs 4 and 5 of the application that the impugned order was passed on 15.05.2024, whereas the applicant applied for a certified copy on 21.06.2025, i.e., after a delay of 13 months. The same was delivered to the applicant on 16.09.2025. There is no sufficient material on record to s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
