Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R. T. VACHHANI, J
NEELAMBEN @ PUNAMBEN HARDEVBHAI JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application seeks condonation of delay in revision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court observes that delay lacks satisfactory explanation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. application is dismissed due to gross delay. (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of filing the present Criminal Misc. Application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 , seeking condonation of delay of 1001 days caused in preferring Criminal Revision Application under Section 3 97 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the judgment and order dated 18.11.2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class Sihori in Criminal Case No.520 of 2013, wherein, the Judicial Magistrate First Class Sihori was pleased to acquit the respondents Nos. 2 to 8, from the charges under Sections 498A , 323, 504, 506(2), 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act alongwith order dated 19.03.2019 passed by the
3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Deesa in Criminal Appeal No.66 of 2017.
2. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant.
3. It is manifestly clear that no reference with regard to the delay caused by the applicant in preferring the present application is made in the present app
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
