Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J
RINKESHBHAI @ RAKESHBHAI RAVJIBHAI BHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments for both sides regarding bail. (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. applicant's alleged role and charge details. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's considerations and reasoning on bail. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. final court decision on bail application. (Para 11 , 15) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Munjal Acharya for learned Advocate Mr. Ravikumar Pathak on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. L.B. Dabhi for the respondent-State.
2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.
3. The present applicant who has been arraigned as an accused has preferred this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11184001241704 of 2024 registered with Bodeli Police Station, District: Chhotaudaipur for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 238, 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Samhita , 2023 and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act after filing of the charge- sheet more particularly the application preferred by the applicant having been rejected by the learned Trial Court.
4. Learned Advocate Mr. Acharya would su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
