Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J
SUNITA DYEING MILLS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
TRIBHOVAN BRIJLAL VERMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenging reinstatement. (Para 1) |
| 2. facts about employment termination. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's rationale for compensation. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. final ruling by the court. (Para 9) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Present petition is filed by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned award dated 06.07.2018 passed in T. Application No. 623 of 2003 by the Labour Court, Surat, whereby the Labour Court has allowed the application and ordered to reinstate the workman with 25% back wages and costs and the order dated 30.09.2023 passed by the Industrial Court, Surat in Appeal (I.C.) No.54 of 2018 whereby the Industrial Court rejected the appeal.
2. Brief facts of the present case are that the applicant - respondent herein was alleged to appoint as workman in the company and work in dyeing department from 18.05.2001 for a period of two years at the salary of Rs.6,000/- and without there being any reason his services came to be terminated by the opponent – petitioner herein from 01.03.2003 and, therefore, the respondent preferred application before the concerned Labour Court under the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
