Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
NIKHIL S. KARIEL, J
RENE JOSHILDA GOLDWIN JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of allegations against applicant. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail application. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's discretion in granting bail. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. final decision on bail application. (Para 13) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Vishalkumar Tomar, appearing on behalf of the applicant, learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. L.B. Dhabi, appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.
3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11192011250293/2025 registered with Bopal Police Station, Ahmedabad, for the offence punishable under Section s 351 (3), 353(1)(B) of BNS Act and Section 66 (C) of IT Act.
4. Learned advocate Mr. Tomar for the applicant would submit that considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet is filed no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
