SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 11314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MKT
ELYSIUM PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
FHATESINH MANSINH JADAV – Respondent



Petitioner Advocates:MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) ,Respondent Advocate: NOTICE SERVED(4)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13287 of 2025 R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13736 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13737 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13738 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13739 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13740 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13741 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13742 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13743 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13744 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13745 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13746 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13747 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13748 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13749 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13750 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13751 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13752 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13753 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13756 of 2025 R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13757 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13758 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13759 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13760 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13761 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13762 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13763 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13764 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13765 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13766 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13767 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13768 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13769 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13770 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13771 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13772 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13773 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13774 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13775 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13776 of 2025 R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13779 of 2025 R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13780 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13781 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13782 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13784 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13785 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13843 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13847 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13856 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13857 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13860 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13865 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13869 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13874 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9746 of 2025 ==========================================================

ELYSIUM PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED Versus FHATESINH MANSINH JADAV ==========================================================

Appearance:

SENIOR ADVOCATE MR K.M.PATEL with MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M. K. THAKKER Date : 09/10/2025

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned senior advocate Mr.K.M.Patel submits that though no dispute was raised with regard to the wages for the period of strike, learned Deputy Labour Commissioner has referred to the learned tribunal and directed to decide the same. Learned senior advocate Mr.K.M.Patel submits that said order was subject matter of challenge in SCA No.9746 of 2025. Learned senior advocate Mr.K.M.Patel submits that during the pendency of the petition actions were taken dismissing the present respondent and for that application under section 33(2)(b) came to be filed seeking approval of the dismissal. Learned senior advocate Mr.K.M.Patel submits that preliminary objections were taken of the respondent stating that this would fall under section 33(1)(b) and not under section 33(2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top