SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 11494

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SVP
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
ANOPSING @ ANUBHA GAGAJI PINGAL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) ,Respondent Advocate: RULE SERVED(64)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1687 of 2012 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO Sd/-

==========================================================

Approved for Reporting No ==========================================================

STATE OF GUJARAT Versus ANOPSING @ ANUBHA GAGAJI PINGAL ==========================================================

Appearance:

MS. C.M. SHAH, APP for the Appellant(s) No. 1 RULE SERVED for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO Date : 07/10/2025

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The appeal is filed by the appellant State under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order of acquittal passed by the learned Special Judge, Jamnagar (hereinafter referred to as “the learned Trial Court”) in Special (GEB) Case No. 13/2009 on 26.07.2012, whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section

135 of The Indian Electricity Act, 2003.

1.1 The respondent is hereinafter referred to as “the accused” as he stood in the original case for the sake of convenienc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top