GUJARAT HIGH COURT
A. D. Shah, J
Mohanbhai Bhomraj – Appellant
Versus
Keshavlal Popatlal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interpretation of section 319 in context of rejoining discharged accused in trials. (Para 1 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. clarification of trial vs inquiry stages for criminal procedures. (Para 12 , 13 , 17) |
1. A question with regard to the interpretation of S. 319 of the Criminal P. C., 1973 ('the Code'), arises in this Miscellaneous Criminal Application, which is now converted into a special criminal application, at the request of the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner.
2. The question arises in the following circumstances.
3. The present petitioner is original accused No. 4 in proceedings which are pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 7th Court, Ahmedabad, being Criminal Case No. 1158 of 1977. Respondent No. 3 Keshavlal Popatlal attached as Accountant to a firm named Anwarbeg Gausbeg and Company, Manufacturing and Distributing Incensed Sticks (Agarbatti), filed a complaint before the learned Magistrate on 17-6-1977 complaining that there was violation of the registered trade mark of his firm in "Guru Darbar Agarbatti" supplied by accused No. 1 Dahyabhai Ambalal and accused No. 2 - Narendrabhai Manibhai Modi (present respondent No. 2) and one Kanubhai Gopal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.