SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 6

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
A. D. Shah, J
Mohanbhai Bhomraj – Appellant
Versus
Keshavlal Popatlal – Respondent


Table of Content
1. interpretation of section 319 in context of rejoining discharged accused in trials. (Para 1 , 8 , 9)
2. clarification of trial vs inquiry stages for criminal procedures. (Para 12 , 13 , 17)

1. A question with regard to the interpretation of S. 319 of the Criminal P. C., 1973 ('the Code'), arises in this Miscellaneous Criminal Application, which is now converted into a special criminal application, at the request of the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner.

2. The question arises in the following circumstances.

3. The present petitioner is original accused No. 4 in proceedings which are pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 7th Court, Ahmedabad, being Criminal Case No. 1158 of 1977. Respondent No. 3 Keshavlal Popatlal attached as Accountant to a firm named Anwarbeg Gausbeg and Company, Manufacturing and Distributing Incensed Sticks (Agarbatti), filed a complaint before the learned Magistrate on 17-6-1977 complaining that there was violation of the registered trade mark of his firm in "Guru Darbar Agarbatti" supplied by accused No. 1 Dahyabhai Ambalal and accused No. 2 - Narendrabhai Manibhai Modi (present respondent No. 2) and one Kanubhai Gopal





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top