GUJARAT HIGH COURT
R. A. Mehta, J
Jethalal Raghunath and Another v. Dr. K. H. Sojitra
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the revision application and tenant's rights. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's examination of the necessity of notice under s.12 for fixing interim rent. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial principles regarding notification and rights of parties. (Para 5) |
| 4. final ruling quashing prior decisions and allowing the application. (Para 6) |
1. This is a revision application referred to us by our Brother R. A. Mehta, J. by his order dt. 21-2-1984.
2. In order to understand what the controversy is, the history of this litigation is required to be looked at. The opponent herein, who admittedly is a tenant of the premises situated at Jamnagar, has filed an application for fixation of standard rent in respect of the premises hired by him from the present petitioners - landlords. He has a right to file an application and there is no controversy about it. In that substantive application itself, the opponent - tenant filed an application for fixation of interim rent, presumably under S.11(3) of the Bombay Rent Act . The learned trial Judge fixed the interim rent of Rs. 1575/- p.m. as against the contractual rent of Rs. 2500/-. Soon on being served with this order fixing the interim rent,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.