SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
A. S. Dave, J
Arvind Balashanker Joshi v. State of Gujarat


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Dhruva
For the Respondents: Mr. S. P. Dave

1. On being aggrieved by the judgment and order of the learned Addl. City Sessions Judge Ahmedabad delivered on 19-10-1981 in Criminal Appeal No. 178/80 upholding the order of conviction for the offences punishable u / S.409, S.420, S.468 and S.471 of the I.P.C. passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Ahmedabad in Criminal Case No. 4066/80 dated 18-7-1980, the petitioner accused has challenged the impugned conviction order in this criminal revision application.

2. According to the prosecution, two accused namely Shri Arvind Balshankar Joshi Accused No. 1 and Shri Jayantilal Ambalal Trivedi Accused No. 2 were chargesheeted and prosecuted in the court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad for the offences alleged to have been committed u / S.120(B),409, 420, 466, 468 and 471 of the I.P. Code. On appreciation of the prosecution evidence, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the original accused No. 2 Shri Jayantilal Ambalal Trivedi but accused No. 1 petitioner has been held liable for the alleged offences and he has been convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/-, in default of payment of fine to s






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top