SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 15

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
A. S. Dave, J
Liquidator of the Society – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 123 of 2011 | Special Civil Application No. 26713 of 2007 | Special Civil Application No. 4353 of 2008



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. M.S. Rao
For the Respondents: Mr. P. K. Jani, Mr. Bharat Jani, Mr. Pranav Desai, Mr. B. H. Bhagat, Mr. K. I. Shah, Mr. C. Z. Shankhla, Mr. K. K. Pujara, Mr. Shramik Bhatt, Mr. Shalin Mehta, Mr. Mihir Thakore, Mr. Dhaval C. Dave, Mr. Ritvij Bhatt

The court affirmed that the Liquidator of a cooperative society has the authority to sell society assets and that land acquired for public purpose remains under valid use, regardless of subsequent ownership disputes.

Headnote:(A) Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 - Section 90(1) - Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, and 16 - Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Section 13(2) - Winding up of a cooperative society - Liquidator’s powers - The Liquidator challenged notice issued by bank under Securitisation Act regarding recovery of dues from society, asserting that the Act does not apply in this case based on specific statutory provisions regarding cooperative societies and land acquisition. (Paras 1-40)

(B) Statutory authority and powers of Liquidator - The court ruled that the Liquidator is empowered to sell lands of the society as the assets vest in the Liquidator upon winding up as per Section 90(1) of the Act. (Paras 17.2-17.3)

(C) Public purpose of land acquisition - The court pointed out that the land acquired for public purpose has not deviated from this purpose; hence, the subsequent auction of the land remains valid. (Paras 22-40)

(D) Jurisdiction of State in land matters - The court noted that the government failed to prove its ownership or vested interest in the lands, deeming the auction proceedings valid and binding. (Paras 30-32)

1. The petitioner is a Liquidator of the Society appointed under S.90 (1) of the Multi - State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002. The petitioner is not an Official Liquidator nor is a Liquidator envisaged under the Companies Act, 1956.

2. M/s. Petrofils Co - operative Limited was a National Cooperative Society (the Society for short) in which the Government of India had 84% share capital. The Society was included in Schedule II to the Multi State Co - operative Societies Act, 1984. For the purpose of manufacturing polyester filament yarn, the said Society was formed, in which Government of India was a majority stakeholder to the extent of 84%. The Society was a co - operative society registered under the Multi - State Cooperative Societies Act, 1984. For the purpose of developing the industry Petrofils and township for the employees and staff of Petrofils, land was needed. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC for short) constituted under the Gujarat Industrial Development Act , 1962 (GID Act for short), applied to the State Government for acquisition of land for the Society, necessary for such public purpose. The State Government under a notification dated 9.6.1978 decided to acquire the required land for public purpose, namely, for establishment of Petrofils industry and construction of a township for employees of Petrofils at Vadodara. The Government contributed a sum of Rs.1000/- from the public revenue towards the compensation for such land acquisition. For lands which are now purchased by respondents no.16 to 18, a notification under S.4 of the Land Acquisition Act , 1894 (for short 'the LA Act') was issued on 23.8.1979, notification under S.6 was issued on 21.8.1981 and the land was acquired by consent award passed on 13.10.1981. Similarly for land purchased by other respondents, notification under S.4 of the LA Act was issued on 2.9.1974, notification under S.6 was issued on 11.6.1976 and the land was acquired by consent award passed on 13.7.1976. The entire cost of acquisition expenses and the entire amount of compensation to the land owners was paid by GIDC and the possession of entire acquired land was directly taken by GIDC from the farmers / land owners.

3. It is undisputed that Petrofils industry and township was also constructed on the land so acquired. However, sometime in the year 1994-95, Petrofils started facing severe financial crisis due to which two of its plants had to be shut down. Over a period of time all operations of the society came to a halt. When all hopes for revival of the unit were abandoned, the Government of India decided to initiate steps for winding up the Society. On 11.4.2001, the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies appointed a liquidator to finalise the liquidation within stipulated time. One of the creditors of the Society approached the Ahmedabad Bench of Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT for short) by filing Original Application No.410 of 2001 for recovery of dues. Different other creditors followed the suit and several Original Applications were filed against the Society before the DRT, Ahmedabad for recovery of dues.

4. On 23.4.2007, DRT Ahmedabad, allowed the Original Applications of the creditors and directed the liquidator to pay to IDBI the decreed amount with interest. The liquidator thereupon challenged the said judgment of the DRT, Ahmedabad dated 23.4.2007 before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal ("DRAT" for short). Such appeals were admitted. Interim stay against further proceedings was granted.

5. The IDBI bank issued notice under S.13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'the Securitisation Act') on 16.8.2007 seeking to recover a sum of Rs.755.42 crores (rounded off) with interest from the Society failing which the bank would take measures under the Securitisation Act. The liquidator responded to such notice under a communication dated 17.9.2007 raising objections. On 28.9.20






































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top