Back
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
C.K. Buch, J
Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
M/s. VI. Pandya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction and order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on enforceability of the award post-judicial appointment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. supreme court clarifications on jurisdictional issues. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's stance on objections to jurisdiction and validity of the award. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 5. decision to dismiss the petition. (Para 17) |
1. By this petition under Art.226 and Art.227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Limited, has challenged the order dated 6.12.2010 passed by the Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as "the Arbitration Tribunal") in Arbitration Reference No.112 of 1998.
2. The petitioner, a Government of Gujarat undertaking company, invited tender for canal related works contract. The petitioner accepted the contract of the respondent M/s. VI. Pandya for the works contract for distributaries for Block No.9 - A / 6 for earth work, brick lining and structure work estimated at Rs.3,48,28,105/-.
2.1 After the works contract was over, the respondent herein raised a dispute and filed Arbitration Reference No.112 of 1998 before the Trib
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
