Electric distribution companies cannot charge consumers for transformer costs as such charges violate existing regulations; statutory directives from regulatory authorities must be adhered to without exception.

1. This Letters Patent Appeal No. 74 of 2014 is filed by the present appellant (hereinafter referred to as Electric Company in LPA No. 74 of 2014) against the judgment and order dated 22.10.2013 passed by learned Single Judge wherein, Special Civil Application preferred by the Appellant was dismissed and order passed by The Electricity Ombudsman Gujarat State in Case No. 82 of 2011 dated 9.1.2012 was challenged.

2. Whereas, Letters Patent Appeal No. 1583 of 2019, Letters Patent Appeal No. 1582 of 2019 and Letters Patent Appeal No. 1584 of 2019 are against the order passed by learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 4668 of 2016; Special Civil Application No. 4311 of 2016 and Special Civil Application No. 5229 of 2016 dated 30.4.2019 respectively preferred by the respondent No. 1 with a request to quash the orders passed by the Electricity Ombudsman directing the difference of charges to the Appellant. As all these Letters Patent Appeal are based on identical facts and are raising similar questions of law, with the consent of the parties, the matters are taken up for joint hearing in this Court for the purpose of concluding decision of this group of Letters Patent Appeals.

3. The facts are extract from the lead matter i.e. Letters Patent Appeal No. 1583 of 2019.
3.1 It is the case of the Appellant that Appellant being Co - operative Housing Society registered under the provisions of the Gujarat Co - operative Societies Act, 1961 . The main object of the Society is for providing 52 residential accommodation to its members by constructing their respective bungalows. The society needed electric connection for the purpose of construction as well as for the residential bungalows. The land of the society was abutting the Town Planning Scheme where the respondent - Company electric sub station was situated and had its distribution mains and from where, the respondent No.1 - Company was required to lay the service line for supplying the electricity to the society and its members. The Appellant needed the following electricity supply for the residences of its members in the society.

3.2 As per say of the Appellant, the provision of Regulation 4.1 (i) of the GERC (Licensee's Power to Recover Expenditure) Regulations, 2005, the Appellant and its members for domestic consumers made a demand on KW basis for the aforesaid total load of 517 KW for supply of electricity from the respondent No.1 Distribution Company. Respondent - Company is duty bound to recover charges on KW basis from the Appellant in accordance with the directions dated 30.12.2010 issued by GERC and as per the schedule reflected in the communication dated 30.12.2010. As per say of the Appellant, respondent No.1 - Electric Company cannot recover the cost of transformer and service line from the Society and its members being domestic consumers. On 25.2.2013, the Appellant applied to the respondent No.1 for providing electricity supply for itself and for its 52 members being the bungalows. Respondent No.1 without any authority has collected huge amount of Rs. 16,55,665 - and Rs.40,713/- from the Appellant. The Appellant - Society made a complaint to the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum of the respondent No.1 vide complaint No. 22/2015-16, wherein, it was prayed for a refund of the excess amount of Rs. 16,96,378/-. The Grievance Forum, ignoring the provisions of the Central Act, State Act and Regulations enacted by the GERC being the regulatory authority and the directions issued by it from time to time as well as the provisions of Supply Code, mechanically pass