Back
AHMEDABAD HTGH COURT
A., J
Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Minakshi Shantilal Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summarizes the factual background of the case. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments from bajaj allianz general ins. co. ltd. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments from icici lombard general ins. co. ltd. (Para 5) |
| 4. arguments from the original claimant. (Para 6) |
| 5. court's assessment of negligence and legal principles. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. conclusions on the entitlement and interpretation of legal representatives. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 7. final conclusion and dismissal of appeals. (Para 13) |
1. Both the above captioned first appeals under S.173 read with S.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, arising out of common judgment and award, are at the instance of the appellant - original opponent No. 6 in First Appeal No. 1792 of 2020 and appellant - original opponent No. 3 in First Appeal No. 2222 of 2020 respectively, and are directed against the self - same judgment and award dated 15.1.2020 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Main), Gandhinagar in MACP No. 151 of 2010 by which the learned Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition filed by the original claimant (opponent No. 6).
2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal may be summarised as under:
2.1 First Appeal No. 1792 of 2020 is filed by the appel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
