Back
GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD
V. P. Patel (President)
original opponent No. 1 – Appellant
Versus
original complainant – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. insurable interest established at the time of accident. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. appellant argues against findings of deficiency of service. (Para 5) |
| 3. court upheld insurable interest based on documentation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final affirmation of the lower court's ruling. (Para 12) |
1. The appellant / original opponent No. 1 has filed present appeal under S.41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Junagadh dated 11.9.2019 in complaint No. 45 of 2016.
2. Heard learned Advocate Mr. D.M. Soni, for the appellant.
2.1. The appellant is the original opponent No. 1, respondent No. 1 is original complainant and respondent No. 2 is original opponent No. 2 in this appeal. Hereinafter the appellant and respondents will be referred as per their original status.
3. Facts of the case of the complainant: The complainant has obtained commercial vehicle policy for his truck bearing registration No. GJ - 11 - Y - 6325 from opponent No. 1 through opponent No. 2. Opponent No. 1 has issued the commercial vehicle policy for the period between 18.11.2014 to 17
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
