Back
GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD
UNKNOWN, UNKNOWN
Complainant Company – Appellant
Versus
Insurance Company – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the complainant’s claim. (Para 1) |
| 2. insurance company’s arguments against claim. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. surveyor's report and assessment of loss. (Para 3) |
| 4. complainant’s rebuttal and proposal for evidence. (Para 5) |
| 5. insurer's defense regarding policy terms. (Para 6) |
| 6. analysis of policy specifics. (Para 7) |
| 7. examination of expert opinions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 8. inspecting validity of expert conclusions. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 9. evidence supporting insurance company’s decision. (Para 13 , 14) |
1. The Complainant herein has filed this complaint to claim compensation of Rs. 69,21,960 together with interest and cost. It is case of the complainant that complainant is Registered Private Limited Company under the Companies Act , and Mr. B.B. Maurya is authorized to file this complaint for and on behalf of complainant Company. The complainant Company is engaged in the business of manufacturing submersible pump and installation thereof. It is say of the complainant that the Deputy Engineer, Public Health and Chemical Division, Water and Drainage Supply Board of State of Gujarat (having its office at Surendranagar), invited tenders for the submersible pump wherein complainant wa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
