SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 12596

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MRM
ARJUN PRITAMSINGH PUNJABI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:CHETAN D KARIYA(8819) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 9694 of 2025 ==========================================================

ARJUN PRITAMSINGH PUNJABI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

==========================================================

Appearance:

CHETAN D KARIYA(8819) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR TILAKKUMAR N THAKWANI(10290) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR SADIK A ANSARI(5388) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR JAY A MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 22/09/2025

ORAL ORDER

1. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11993006220754 of 2022 registered with A-Division Gandhidham Police Station, Kachchh East-Gandhidham.

2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant, learned advocate appearing for the Original Complainant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.

3. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent - State and learned Advocate Mr. Sad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top