Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAJMOHINI @ RAJMOHUNABEN KIDIYABHAI DAMOR – Appellant
Versus
SHAYAM HARISHBHAI DHOKAI & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and procedural context of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for compensation adjustment and disability evaluation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's assessment of evidence regarding claimant’s income and disability. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal principles related to disability assessment and functional impacts. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. implications of medical evaluations and additional evidence for judgment. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. impact of disfigurement on compensation assessment. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. guidelines for medical expenses and compensation adjustments. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. finalized calculations of compensation entitlement. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 9. conclusion of the case and directives for compensation disbursement. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
CAV JUDGMENT
1) Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 23.06.2023 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Vadodara (which shall hereinafter be referred to as "the Tribunal" for short), in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.677 of 2016, the appellant – original claimant has preferred the present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (which shall hereinafter be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
