SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 12791

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
AS, PT
TOMY JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MS. ANKITA S. SHAH(18002) ,Respondent Advocate: MR PRADIP D BHATE(1523)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15583 of 2025 =============================================

TOMY JOSEPH Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

=============================================

Appearance:

MS. ANKITA S. SHAH(18002) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 KARAN G SANGHANI(7945) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR PRADIP D BHATE(1523) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 =============================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI Date : 01/12/2025

ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA)

1. At the outset, learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr.Karan Sanghani has submitted that the issue involved in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 17.09.2025 passed in Special Civil Application No.9909 of 2022 and allied matters. However, learned advocate Ms. Ankita Shah, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, has doubted the legal precedent of the Division Bench laid down in the aforesaid judgment and order dated 17.09.2025 passed in Special Civil Application No.9909 of 2022 and allied matters. She has further submitted that there are certain other issues directly connect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top