Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Ignoring Court-Mandated PWD Safety Report Invalidates Municipal Order: J&K&L High Court
06 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Reserves Verdict in Raju Tampering Conviction Plea
06 Mar 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
AS, PT
RADHADARSHAN PETROPACK LLP – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9511 of 2025 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9647 of 2025 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI ==========================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No ==========================================================
RADHADARSHAN PETROPACK LLP Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
ASHVA LEGAL ADVISORS LLP(13473) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR.AVINASH PODDAR(9761) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS ANCHAL A PODDAR(13386) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR AKASH GUPTA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3 MS HETVI H SANCHETI(5618) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3 ==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.
Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, which restricted refunds of IGST on exports where benefits of certain notifications were availed, was declared void for future cases following its omission by new legis....
Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules was declared ultra vires Section 16 of the IGST Act for imposing unjust restrictions on exporters' right to claim IGST refunds.
The court ruled that the denial of a tax refund on grounds of limitation was wrong, emphasizing the principle of unjust enrichment, and clarified that the time limit of two years for refund applicati....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.