SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 13021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MCT
SURESHBHAI MAGANBHAI PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
HASMUKHBHAI PUNJABHAI CHAVDA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR SHUSHIL R SHUKLA(5603) ,Respondent Advocate: RULE UNSERVED(68)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1294 of 2014 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI ==========================================================

Approved for Reporting Yes No ==========================================================

SURESHBHAI MAGANBHAI PRAJAPATI Versus HASMUKHBHAI PUNJABHAI CHAVDA & ORS.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR SHUSHIL R SHUKLA(5603) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR DAKSHESH MEHTA(2430) for the Defendant(s) No. 3 RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 2 RULE UNSERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1 ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI Date : 04/12/2025

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The captioned appeal is preferred against the impugned judgment and award dated 30.01.2014 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Kheda at Nadiad in M.A.C.P. No. 1672 of 2009, whereby the learned Tribunal has partly allowed the claim petition and awarded a sum of Rs.2,53,214/-(Rupees Two Lakh Fifty Three Thousand Two Hundred Fourteen Only) along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date of filing of the claim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top