IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HDS
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GAURAV JAGDISHBHAI MEGHANI – Respondent
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/2074/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 19/12/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2074 of 2023
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1943 of 2023
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
==============================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
√
==============================================
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Versus
GAURAV JAGDISHBHAI MEGHANI & ANR.
==============================================
Appearance:
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR.HIREN M MODI(3732) for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2
==============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 19/12/2025
ORAL JUDGMENT
Since both these appeals arise out of the same accident
against and the grounds and issues involved are common, they
have been heard together and are being decided by this
common judgment. The First Appeal No.2074 of 2023 arises out
of MAC Petition No.21 of 2020 and the First Appeal No.1943 of
2023 arises out of MAC Petition No.20 of 2020.
1) Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award
dated 23.09.2022 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal (Main), Botad (which shall hereinafter be referred to as
Page 1 of 7
Uploaded by ANKIT YOGESHBHAI JANSARI(HCW0109) on Mon Dec 22 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Dec 27 12:12:02 IST 2025
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/2074/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 19/12/2025
undefined
"the Tribunal" for short), in Motor Accident Claim Petition
Nos.20 of 2020 and 21 of 2020, the appellant – Insurance
Company – original respondent no.2, has preferred the present
appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
(which shall hereinafter be referred to as "the Act" for short).
2) Heard Mr. R. P. Raval learned Advocate for the appellants –
Insurance Company and Mr. H. M. Modi learned Advocate for
respondents. Perused the original record and proceedings.
3) It is the case of the original claimant that on 05.12.2019, the
deceased Nikitaben i.e. sister of the original claimant along with
deceased Bhavnaben i.e. mother of the original claimant along
with claimant were going from Salangpur to Refada Village in
Verna Car bearing Reg. No.GJ-04-DA-5239 owned by the
opponent no.1. When they reached the place of incident at that
time the opponent no.1 was driving the said car in rash and
negligent manner due to which he lost control over the steering
and the car overturned in the Narmada Canal due to which
deceased Nikitaben and Bhavnaben drowned in the canal and
later taken out from the car and both were found in unconscious
condition. Thus, they were taken to Sonawala Hospital, where
they declared as dead. Therefore, the claimant has filed MAC
Petitions seeking compensation, wherein, the learned Tribunal
after appreciating the evidence produced on record in the
respective petitions, has partly allowed both the claim petitions.
4) Learned Advocate Mr. R. P. Raval has submitted that the learned
Tribunal has not properly considered the fact that the driver did
not have any license to drive the car on the date of accident and
therefore the Insurance Company had no liability to pay any
Page 2 of 7
Uploaded by ANKIT YOGESHBHAI JANSARI(HCW0109) on Mon Dec 22 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Dec 27 12:12:02 IST 2025
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/2074/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 19/12/2025
undefined
compensation and the Tribunal has committed error in ordering
pay and recover order against the appellant. He has further
submitted that the one deceased is the daughter and another
deceased is the wife of the owner cum driver of the vehicle and
hence a pay and recover order means the amount is to be paid
to the son and recovered from the father. Hence, he has
requested to allow both the appeals.
5) Learned Advocate Mr. H. M. Modi for the respondents has
submitted that the Tribunal has not committed any error in
passing the impugned judgment and hence both the appeals are
required to be dismissed.
6) Having heard both the learned Advocates, going through t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.