IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
PMR
SHASHANK PRAVINCHANDRA JAIN(DOSHI) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/8882/2019 IA ORDER DATED: 29/12/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (MODIFICATION/DELETION OF
CONDITION) NO. 2 of 2025
In R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 8882 of 2019
==========================================================
SHASHANK PRAVINCHANDRA JAIN(DOSHI)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR FENIL H BATHIYA(13663) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
UTKARSH SHARMA APP for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 29/12/2025
IA ORDER
1. RULE returnable forthwith. Ld. APP waives service of
Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
2. Present application is filed by the applicant for
modification of conditions imposed vide order dated
19.06.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 8882
of 2019 by this Court.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that
while enlarging the applicant on bail, this Court vide order
dated 19.06.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Application
No.8882 of 2019 has imposed condition nos.(c) and (d) i.e.
“the applicant shall surrender passport, if any, to the lower
Court within a week” and “the applicant shall not leave the
Page 1 of 3
Uploaded by MR.MAHENDRA MOHANBHAI PUROHIT(HCD0074) on Mon Dec 29 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jan 06 06:09:51 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/8882/2019 IA ORDER DATED: 29/12/2025
undefined
State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions
Judge concerned, respectively”. It is further submitted that
the applicant is practicing chartered accountant and is
having client outside India and is therefore required to
travel outside India frequently. It is further submitted that
the applicant is obeying all the conditions imposed upon
him vide aforesaid order regularly. He has, therefore,
submitted that the aforesaid conditions be kept in abeyance
for a suitable period.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted
that the applicant has not placed on record the immediate
travel plan and therefore, no reason has occasion for this
Court to keep the aforesaid condition in abeyance and thus,
has prayed to dismiss the present application.
5. Heard learned advocate Mr. Premal S. Rachh for the
applicant, learned APP for the Respondent State as well as
perused the documentary evidences produced on record.
6. Having regard to the cause shown in the application,
the conditions in question are ordered to be kept in
abeyance for a period of six months subject to deposit of
amount of Rs. 2 lacs before the concerned Trial Court
towards security deposit which shall be refunded to the
applicant upon expiry of the aforesaid period. The applicant
shall furnish detailed travel itinerary before the trial Court
before traveling abroad during the aforesaid Period. Other
conditions of the order dated 19.06.2019 shall remain
intact.
Page 2 of 3
Uploaded by MR.MAHENDRA MOHANBHAI PUROHIT(HCD0074) on Mon Dec 29 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jan 06 06:09:51 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/8882/2019 IA ORDER DATED: 29/12/2025
undefined
7. Present application stands disposed of. Rule is made
absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.
(P. M. RAVAL, J)
MMP
Page 3 of 3
Uploaded by MR.MAHENDRA MOHANBHAI PUROHIT(HCD0074) on Mon Dec 29 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jan 06 06:09:51 IST 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.