SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 3795

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
DHAVALKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI PARMARV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.MA/24351/2025



##PAGE1##

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/24351/2025 ORDER DATED: 04/02/2026

undefined

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER

CHARGESHEET) NO. 24351 of 2025

==========================================================

DHAVALKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI PARMAR

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR. HARSHAL S. PATEL(14220) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR.DIPEN F CHAUDHARI(6740) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR RONAK RAVAL, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)

No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

Date : 04/02/2026

ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Harshal Patel for learned

advocate Mr.Dipen Chaudhari appearing on behalf of the

applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.Ronak

Raval appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of

the respondent-State.

3. The applicant has filed this application under Section

483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for

enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR

being C.R. No. 11195035250162/2025 registered with

Palanpur Taluka Police Station, Banaskantha for the offence

Page 1 of 6

Uploaded by BHOOMI YOGESHKUMAR MISTRY(HC01557) on Thu Feb 05 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Mar 23 02:55:36 IST 2026

##PAGE2##

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/24351/2025 ORDER DATED: 04/02/2026

undefined

punishable under Sections 108, 351(3) of the BNS.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that

considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of

the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on

regular bail. It is further submitted that since the charge-

sheet is filed no useful purpose would be served by keeping

the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further

contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by

all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if

released on bail.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent – State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP

has submitted that looking to the nature of offence and the

role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from

the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise the discretion in

favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of

the respective parties and perused the papers. Following

aspects are considered:-

Page 2 of 6

Uploaded by BHOOMI YOGESHKUMAR MISTRY(HC01557) on Thu Feb 05 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Mar 23 02:55:36 IST 2026

##PAGE3##

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/24351/2025 ORDER DATED: 04/02/2026

undefined

i. The allegation being that the applicant had

abetted/incited the deceased into committing the

unfortunate act and whereas, it would appear that as of

now, there is no material which would link the present

applicant to the unfortunate act in question.

ii. It would appear in this regard that the deceased i.e. the

wife of the complainant had consumed poison alleging that

the present applicant was threatening and forcing her to

enter into relationship by telling that he would kill her child

as well as the complainant if the deceased did not comply.

iii.The allegation of the applicant having talked with the

deceased over social media, as of now being only a mere

version since there is nothing recovered by the

Investigating Officer from the mobile phone of the present

applicant or of the deceased.

iv. The complainant in the complaint submitting that the

applicant had told him that he would sent some screen

shorts etc. showing the conversation between the applicant

and the deceased wife who committed the unfortunate act,

probably being a version of the husband i.e. the

complainant.

Page 3 of 6

Uploaded by BHOOMI YOGESHKUMAR MISTRY(HC01557) on Thu Feb 05 2026 Downloaded on : Mon Mar 23 02:55:36 IST 2026

##PAGE4##

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/24351/2025 ORDER DATED: 04/02/2026

undef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top