IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10476 of 2008 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR ORDERS) NO. 1 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10476 of 2008 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10477 of 2008 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10477 of 2008 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10478 of 2008 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR ORDERS) NO. 1 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10478 of 2008 With R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10479 of 2008 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 1 of 2025 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10479 of 2008 =======================================================

LOYOLA EDUCATION SOCIETY Versus CHANDULAL NAROTTAM SURTI & ORS.

=======================================================

Appearance:

MR PERCY KAVINA, Sr. Adv. with MS AISHWARI R SHAH(17307) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR PR NANAVATI(508) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MS KRUTI M SHAH(2428) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MS DILBUR CONTRACTOR(6388) for the Respondent(s) No.

1.1,1.10,1.11,1.12,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,1.6,1.7,1.8,1.9 =======================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI Date : 19/02/2026 ORAL ORDER

1. Since all these matters are connected with each other and the disputes involved in all these matters are related to same land, all these petitions are heard together and are being decided by this common order.

2. By filing Special Civil Application No.10476/2008 under Articles 14, 19, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as well as under the provision of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 and under the provision of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 17.06.2008 passed by the Hon’ble Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Revision Application No.TEN.AS 5 of 2003 and thereby prayed for restoration of the order dated 02.06.1984 passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Vadodara granting permission under Section 36 of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.

3. By filing Special Civil Application No.10477/2008 under Articles 14, 19, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as well as under the provision of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 17.06.2008 passed by the Hon’ble Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Revision Application No.TEN.BS 129 of 2003 and thereby prayed for restoration of the order dated 09.04.1984 passed by the learned Deputy Collector, Olpad in Tenancy Case No.620 of 1984.

4. By filing Special Civil Application No.10478/2008 under Articles 14, 19, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as well as under the provision of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 17.06.2008 passed by the Hon’ble Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Revision Application No.TEN.BS 37 of 2002; the order dated 05.02.2002 passed by the learned Deputy Collector, Olpad in Tenancy Appeal No.22 of 2001 and the order dated 30.07.2001 passed by the learned Mamlatdar & ALT, Choryashi in Case No.70(b) – 9 of 1999.

5. By filing Special Civil Application No.10479/2008 under Articles 14, 19, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as well as under the provision of the Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 and under the provision of the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 17.06.2008 passed by the Hon’ble Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Revision Application No.TEN.AS 10 of 2003, whereby the said Revision Application preferred by the respondent no.1 has been allowed and the order dated 24.07.2003 passed by the learned Deputy Collector, Olpad under Section 84 of the Bombay Tenancy Act, 1948 has been quashed and set aside.

6. The brief facts leading to filing of all these petitions are as