IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
VALA SHIVRAJBHAI DADBHAIV/sSOMPURA MANHARBHAI PRABHASHANKAR
R/SCA/1206/2026
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/1206/2026 ORDER DATED: 03/02/2026
0.5926958509954336
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1206 of 2026
==========================================================
VALA SHIVRAJBHAI DADBHAI
Versus
SOMPURA MANHARBHAI PRABHASHANKAR
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SAGAR B PANDYA(13177) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR.HEMANG H PARIKH(2628) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI
Date : 03/02/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. The present petition is filed under Article 227
of the Constitution of India, petitioner-original plaintiff
has prayed for following reliefs:-
“8.(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this
petition;
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of Certiorari
and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of
Certiorari, quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated
08.08.2025 (Annexure-A) passed by Learned Principal Senior Civil
Judge, Sabarkantha at Idar in Special Civil Suit No. 03 of 2025
whereby the Application below Exh. 06 is dismissed and further
direct to allow the Application below Exh.06 in the interest of justice;
(C) Pending admission, hearing and/or final disposal of this petition,
Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the Respondent to maintain
status quo in respect of the movable and immovable properties lying
in the suit land in the interest of justice and further be pleased to
grant the Application Exh. 6 for appointment of the Court
Commissioner to;
(D) to pass such other and further orders as may be expedient and
necessary in the circumstances of the case.
Page 1 of 10
Uploaded by MANOJ KUMAR(HC01092) on Fri Feb 06 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 11:50:42 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/1206/2026 ORDER DATED: 03/02/2026
0.5926958509954336
2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Hemang Parikh
for the petitioner-original plaintiff.
3. Learned advocate for petitioner has submitted
that the petitioner-original plaintiff has filed a suit
seeking declaration and execution of the Agreement to
Sell dated 06.11.2023, whereby the petitioner had the
first right to purchase the suit property, and also
prayed that, pursuant to the Agreement to Sell dated
06.11.2023, and upon acceptance of remaining
consideration amount, the sale deed in respect of
machinery be executed in favour of plaintiff. In the
alternative, plaintiff has prayed that, in case, defendant
fails to execute the sale deed, Court Commissioner be
appointed for execution of sale deed. The plaintiff has
also prayed for return of an amount of
Page 2 of 10
Uploaded by MANOJ KUMAR(HC01092) on Fri Feb 06 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 11:50:42 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/1206/2026 ORDER DATED: 03/02/2026
0.5926958509954336
Rs.1,05,00,000/- with interest from defendant and has
further sought a restraint order against the defendant
from creating any third-party rights over the suit
property.
3.1 It is further submitted that an application
Ex.6 came to be filed by plaintiff seeking appointment
of a Court Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of
the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (For short ‘CPC). It
is submitted that the purpose of appointing a Court
Commissioner is to ascertain the position of the suit,
so that if the defendant changes the nature of
possession of the suit property, the report of Court
Commissioner would help the plaintiff in establishing
the possession which was prevailing upon the date of
filing of the suit. Reliance has been placed upon the
Page 3 of 10
Uploaded by MANOJ KUMAR(HC01092) on Fri Feb 06 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 11:50:42 IST 2026
##PAGE4##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/1206/2026 ORDER DATED: 03/02/2026
0.5926958509954336
case of Haryana Waqf Board Vs. Shanti Sarup and Ors.
reported in (2008) 8 SCC 671.
3.2 It is further contended that the defendant is
the owner of suit property and in possession of the
same. The plant and machinery lying on the suit land
belong
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.