IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT
JATINKUMAR BHIKHABHAI KALATHIYAV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/SCA/778/2020
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/778/2020 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/02/2026
0.5636062560404449
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 778 of 2020
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT
=============================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
√
=============================================
JATINKUMAR BHIKHABHAI KALATHIYA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
=============================================
Appearance:
MR PA JADEJA(3726) WITH MS SHIVANI BAROT for Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR SIDDHARTH RAMI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
KISHAN Y DAVE(8293) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MR RASESH H PARIKH(3862) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MR.HEMANG H PARIKH(2628) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MR MAULIK NANAVATI FOR NANAVATI &CO.(7105) for Respondent No. 2
=============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT
Date : 03/02/2026
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr.Siddharth Rami, learned
AGP waives service of Rule for the respondent State,
Mr.Maulik Nanavati, learned advocate waives service of Rule
for respondent No.2 and Mr.Hemang Parikh, learned advocate
waives service of Rule for respondent No.3.
2. The present petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:
“(A) Quash and set aside the resolution dated 27-9-2018 passed by
the respondent no. 2 and thereby quash the appointment order
dated 5.10.2018 issued to the respondent no. 3 herein.
Page 1 of 11
Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Wed Feb 04 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 13:12:38 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/778/2020 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/02/2026
0.5636062560404449
(B) Direct the respondent no. 2 to issue fresh order of appointment
to the post of Executive Engineer (Civil) Class – I, only as per merit,
as declared by the team of experts as annexed herein as Annexure-
D and thereby consider the case of the petitioner for appointment
to the said post as he is at Sr. No. 1 in the said list declared by the
expert committee.
(C) Pending final hearing and outcome of the present writ petition,
kindly direct the respondent no. 2, not to regularize the services
conditions of the respondent no. 3 till the present petition is finally
decided.”
BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE :
3. It is not in dispute between the parties that the
petitioner had applied for the post of Executive Engineer
(Civil) pursuant to the advertisement issued by Respondent
No.2 - Corporation. The petitioner had secured the highest
marks among all other candidates. The Selection Committee
appointed by the respondent-Corporation, after scrutinizing
the candidatures of all candidates, prepared a merit list of
candidates in seriatim wherein the petitioner stood at serial
No.1, whereas Respondent No.3 stood at serial No.3. The
respondent Corporation, having the power to appoint the
candidate upon receipt of the said list, has appointed
respondent No.3 herein, instead of the petitioner. Being
aggrieved by the said decision, initially, the petitioner had
approached the respondent State by way of his representation
dated 03/05/2019 and pending its adjudication, approached
this Court by way of this petition with the aforesaid prayers.
SUBMISSIONS OF THE PETITIONER :
4. Mr.Jadeja, learned advocate for the petitioner, has made
the following submissions:
Page 2 of 11
Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Wed Feb 04 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 13:12:38 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/778/2020 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/02/2026
0.5636062560404449
4.1 The petitioner, having undisputedly secured the highest
marks and being placed at serial No.1 in the list prepared by
the Selection Committee of the respondent Corporation, could
not have been denied the appointment to the post of Executive
Engineer (Civil) (Class-I).
4.2 The impugned action of respondent No.2 Corporation is
not only arbitrary but also violative of Article 14 of the
Constitution of India, inasmuch as there is no reason, much
less a cogent one, available to the Corporation to ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.