2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 8351
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS
MAYURDHVAJSINH JAGDISHSINH VAGHELAV/sSTATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.MA/7178/2026
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7178/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026
0.6319581403009112
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO. 7178 of 2026
==========================================================
MAYURDHVAJSINH JAGDISHSINH VAGHELA Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. KARAN Y VYAS(8539) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. MANAN MAHETA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS
Date : 27/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned advocate Mr. Parth V. Bhatt appears and submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondent no.2 – original complainant. He is permitted to file his appearance. Registry shall accept his vakalatnama as and when
the same is filed.
2. By way of preferring the present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant-accused seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court, praying to quash and set-aside the First Information Report No. 11216011240520 of 2024 registered with the Info City Police Station, District Gandhinagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Section 135 of the
Page 1 of 5 Uploaded by AMAR SINGH(HC01081) on Mon Mar 30 2026 Downloaded on : Sun Apr 05 17:21:10 IST 2026
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7178/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026
0.6319581403009112
G.P. Act, the chargesheet as well as the proceedings of the Criminal Case No. 41 of 2025 pending in the Court of the learned 2nd Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gandhinagar, so also
all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto.
3. Today, when the matter is called out, the complainant is personally present before this Court. The complainant has also filed an affidavit, which is annexed at Annexure ‘C’ to the application. In the said affidavit, the complainant has categorically stated that with the intervention of the friends, family members and community people, the dispute with the present applicant has been amicably resolved and there is no ill-
will or any grievance amongst them.
4. Considering the issue involved in the present application as well as considering the fact that the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties, with the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the
present application is taken up for final disposal.
5. RULE returnable forthwith. Learned APP Mr. Manan Maheta waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.1 – State and learned advocate Mr. Parth V. Bhatt waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the
respondent no.2 – complainant.
6. Learned advocate for the applicant-accused has submitted
Page 2 of 5 Uploaded by AMAR SINGH(HC01081) on Mon Mar 30 2026 Downloaded on : Sun Apr 05 17:21:10 IST 2026
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/7178/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/03/2026
0.6319581403009112
that since the dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties, the application may be allowed and the impugned FIR, the chargesheet and the proceedings of the Criminal Case may
be quashed and set-aside.
7. The complainant, who is personally present in the Court, has categorically stated before this Court that he has no objection if the application is allowed and the FIR, the chargesheet as well as the proceedings of the Criminal Case are quashed and set-aside. Thus, it appears from the aforesaid that sending the applicant-accused to face the trial would be nothing but a futile exercise and would amount to abuse of process of
law.
8. The relevant paragraphs of the affidavit filed by the complainant - Ankitbhai Nitinbhai Patel, read thus :
“3. That the impugned FIR came to be registered by me naming the present applicant in the spur of the moment without any proper knowledge and in misunderstanding. That even the said Fi