IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14992 of 2025 =======================================================

SODHA KUPAJI TAGJI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

=======================================================

Appearance:

MR ANAND R PATEL(2424) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR VIJAY N RAVAL(2025) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MS AISHVARYA(8018) for the Respondent(s) No. 3 MR SIDDHARTH DESAI AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2 =======================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI Date : 17/03/2026 ORAL ORDER

1. By filing present petition under Articles 14 and

226 of the Constitution of India as well as under the provision of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 26.08.2022 passed by the Presiding Officer, Land Acquisition & Rehabilitation & Resettlement Authority, Rajkot Zone, Rajkot in Misc. Application No.2/2021 and the order dated 24.09.2019 passed by the I/c. Deputy Collector & Special Land Acquisition Officer (Narmada Yojna), Gandhidham and thereby prayed for direction upon the respondent no.2 to make Reference of the application submitted by the petitioner dated 12.03.2018 filed under Section 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013.

2. Heard learned advocate, Mr. Anand Patel for the petitioner, learned AGP Mr. Siddharth Desai for the respondent nos.1 and 2 and learned advocate, Ms. Aishvarya Gupta for the respondent no.3.

3. The facts of the case in nutshell are that the land bearing Survey No.266/2 admeasuring 14398 Sq.Mtrs. situated in the sim of Village : Deshalpar, Taluka : Mudra, District : Kutch was proposed to be acquired by the respondents under the Narmada Yojna and accordingly, the Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 25.06.2013 and, thereafter, a Notification under Section 6 was issued on 09.01.2014 and, thereafter after following due procedure of law, final award was declared by the Deputy Collector and Special Land Acquisition Officer on 02.07.2015.

4. Learned advocate, Mr. Patel submitted that the respondent authorities ought to have passed award under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act of 2013"), and the award is passed under the Old Act, which is contrary to the provisions of law. He submitted that subsequently, modified award came to be passed by the respondent no.2 on 29.11.2017, whereby Factor-2 was applied to the land in question, and the benefits under Sections 30(1), 30(2) and 30(3) of the Act of 2013, also came to be granted on the enhanced amount of compensation. He submitted that thereafter, the respondent no.2 issued notice to the petitioner, which was duly received upon him on 21.02.2018 and in receipt thereof, the petitioner has filed a Reference Application under Section 64 of the Act of 2013 to the respondent no.2 by Registered Post AD, which was received by them on 12.03.2018, however, the said Reference Application came to be filed by the respondents on the ground that the modified award was passed on 29.11.2017, which was a supplementary award to the original award and the original award was dated 02.07.2015 and therefore, the Reference Application under Section 64 of the Act of 2013 was filed beyond the period of limitation and accordingly, by impugned order dated 26.08.2022, the Presiding Officer, Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Rajkot Zone, Rajkot has rejected the said application, against which, aforesaid writ petition has been preferred.

5. Learned advocate submitted that in a similar case, the Division Bench of this Court, in Special Civil Application No.12417 of 2023 and other allied matters vide order dated 02.01.2024 has set aside such similar impugned orders and remanded the applications under Section 64 of the Act of 2013 to the Deputy Collector and Special Land Acquisition Officer for referring