IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 91 of 2026 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2025 In R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 91 of 2026 ==========================================================

BIJAL BHIMABHAI Versus LHS OF DECD. BHAGA ALA & ORS.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR MIT S THAKKAR(11223) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 ==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN M. DESAI Date : 16/03/2026 ORAL ORDER

1. Learned Senior advocate Ms. Megha Jani assisted by learned advocate Mr. Mit Thakkar for the appellant submits that on a sole one line statement in the cross-examination of plaintiff, that document (Exh-38) of sale is a concocted document, the judgment of the learned Trial Court is reversed by the learned Appellate Court. It is submitted that in the cross-examination produced at page-42 of the paper-book, the plaintiff has stated in para-7 that it is not true that the plaintiff has concocted the sale deed in his favour. It is submitted that the sale deed which, is of 1971 has never been challenged by the contesting defendant. The defendant nos. 2, 3 and 4 have supported the