SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 9408

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
LAVKUMAR HARENDRAKUMAR THAKARV/sBHARATKUMAR NANDKISHOR SHARMA


Modification of Judgment dtd. 25/02/2026 in R/FA/3075/2022

0.7237369493892138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3075 of 2022 [On note for speaking to minutes of order dated 25/02/2026 in R/FA/3075/2022 ]

============================================

LAVKUMAR HARENDRAKUMAR THAKAR & ORS.

Versus BHARATKUMAR NANDKISHOR SHARMA & ORS.

============================================

Appearance:

MR JIGAR G GADHAVI(5613) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5 ADITYA R GUNDECHA(8869) for the Defendant(s) No. 2 MR TANMAY B KARIA(6833) for the Defendant(s) No. 3 RULE UNSERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1 ============================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 09/03/2026

ORAL ORDER

Perused the note for speaking to minutes.

The learned Tribunal has considered 10% contributory negligence of the deceased, however, this Court has observed that the Tribunal has committed error in holding 10% contributory negligence of the deceased. Therefore, as the Insurance Company has deposited Rs.8,79,480/- the amount of Rs.9,77,200/- is required to be substituted with Rs.8,79,480/-.

In view of above, in first and third lines of paragraph no.15 of judgment dated 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top