SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Guj) 1107

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, PRANAV TRIVEDI, JJ.
Suresh Chhaganbhai Bundheliya - Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(3)(1) - Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 4423 of 2026
Decided On : 07-04-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Hardik V Vora(7123)
For the Respondent: Karan G Sanghani(7945)

Reassessment notices for search-related outcomes must strictly adhere to the ten-year statutory limitation period. This period is calculated backward from the end of the assessment year relevant to the financial year in which the search was conducted; notices issued beyond this block are without jurisdiction.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 153A, 153C and 132 - Reassessment proceedings pursuant to search operation - Limitation period for issuance of notice - Determination of "relevant assessment year" for 10-year block - The 10-year period for reopening of assessment is to be calculated backward from the end of the assessment year relevant to the financial year in which the search was initiated. (Paras 7.1, 7.2)

(B) Writ jurisdiction - Availability of remedy at notice stage - Where the lack of jurisdiction is established due to the time-barred nature of the notice, invoking writ jurisdiction is maintainable. (Para 7.2)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged a notice issued under the relevant provisions of the tax legislation, which sought to reopen the assessment for a specific previous year. The revenue contended that the notice was within the 10-year period permitted by law following a search and seizure operation conducted in a later financial year.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the computation of the 10-year block period, as prescribed by the statutory interpretation of the relevant provisions, resulted in the assessment year in question being excluded from the permissible window for reopening, rendering the notice time-barred.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the reassessment notice was issued beyond the 10-year statutory time limit, thereby causing the assessing authority to lack legal jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi: The legal framework establishes distinct modes of computation for the 6-year and 10-year periods. The 10-year limitation period must be reckoned from the end of the assessment year relevant to the financial year in which the search was conducted. Because the impugned assessment year fell outside this 10-year ceiling, the authority exceeded its jurisdiction in issuing the notice.

Result: Petition allowed; impugned notice and assessment proceedings quashed.

JUDGMENT :

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA)

1. RULE. Learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr. Karan Sanghani waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent – Department.

2. At the outset, learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr. Karan Sanghani has submitted that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Special Civil Application No. 16615 of 2025 dated 05.01.2026. Hence, with the consent of the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal today itself.

3. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash and set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 24.03.2025 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 to reassess the income and further to direct the respondent not to proceed further or pass final order under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).

4. The brief facts giving rise to the filing of the present writ petition are that the petitioner had filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2015-16 on 13.03.2016 declaring a total income of Rs.3,30,160/-. It is the case of the petitioner that on 09.05.2024, search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Act was conducted. During the course of search, certain loose papers, notarized documents and pocket diaries were found and seized. In the said search proceedings a notarized agreement dated 04.09.2013 relating to immovable property bearing Revenue Survey No. 129 T.P. No. 51 (Dabholi), Final Plot No. 160/A, Moje Dabholi, Surat along with certain cash noting were found. It is the case of the petitioner that relying on the said documents, the respondents alleged that the petitioner is one of the co-purchasers and that he has purportedly paid unaccounted cash consideration of Rs. 80,80,000/-, which is alleged to have escaped assessment. Therefore, on the basis of the said information, the respondent on 24.03.2025 issued notice under Section 148 of the Act after obtaining approval under Section 151(ii) of the Act from the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat.

4.1. It is the case of the petitioner that in response to the said notice, a detailed reply was filed on 28.04.2025 declaring the income of Rs. 3,30,160/-. Thereafter, the petitioner filed detailed objections on 27.02.2026. Thereafter, the respondent without considering the objections raised by the petitioner, passed an order disposing of the objections on 05.03.2026 and also has issued a show cause notice calling upon the Petitioner to explain as to why an addition of Rs. 80,80,000/- should not be made u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act and directed to submit a reply on or before 12.03.2026. Hence, the petitioner is constrained to file the present writ petition.

5. It is submitted by learned advocate Mr. Vora that in the instant case, the search action was conducted on 09.05.2024 which falls within the specified period and therefore, the reassessment proceedings are governed by the provisions of Sections 147 to 151 of the Act as they stood prior to the amendments introduced by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024. It is submitted that in the present case the year under consideration is Assessment Year 2015-16, and as per proviso to Section 149(1)(b) of the Act no notice under Section 148 of the Act can be issued at any time in case for the relevant Assessment Year beginning on or before 1st day of April, 2021, and if notice under Section 148 or under Section 153A or Section 153C of the Act could not have been issued at that time on account of being beyond the time limit specified under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 149 or Section 153A or Section 153C of the Act, as the case may be, as they stood immediately before the commencement of the Finance Act, 2021.

5.1. It is contended that the reassessment proceedings were initiated based on the documents pertaining t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top